Jump to Navigation

Portsmouth Criminal Defense Blog

Can psychiatrists identify criminal minds, traits in children?

Scientists are effective because they're fascinated by data. They look for links that form logical paths between events and outcomes. Why is that two people can be placed in the same situation and act differently? Why are people like Bernard Madoff able to embezzle millions or billions of dollars without feeling remorse, while other people feel guilty about less serious crimes and turn themselves in?

Although it has not been proven, some psychiatrists believe that Madoff is a sociopath. Like Madoff, sociopaths and psychopaths (used interchangeably) are experts at manipulating people, are extremely selfish and have little empathy for others.

If psychiatrists in Portsmouth were able to test children for sociopathic or psychopathic characteristics, should they? On one hand, successfully identifying those individuals could help reduce criminal activity. On the other hand, the life of an individual who was wrongly labeled could be ruined.

12 DWI cases dismissed when arresting officer didn't show in court

Individuals summoned to court after a drunk driving arrest are allowed due process in order to determine whether they are guilty of their crimes. Part of that due process requires the involved police officers to show up to court as witnesses to the arrests.

So when a state trooper recently failed to show up at court, dozens of criminal cases in which he was directly involved were dismissed, clearing the accused of all charges. Twelve of the cases involved drunk driving arrests.

Man's past, friends led to wrongful arrest after brutal assault

Most people in Virginia and throughout the country have heard about the brutal beach assault of Derek Madrigal. The 21-year-old college student was on spring break and relaxing at the beach. A group of men that Derek didn't know were allegedly harassing a woman, and Derek stepped in to defend her.

The group of men stabbed Derek nine times and beat him with coolers. Eventually, two strangers pulled Derek away from the assault and took him to a medical tent.

Because of the violent nature of the crime and beach's typically paradise-like feel, law enforcement officials are committed to catching everyone involved in the assault. One police officer even said that he was committed to making life "a living hell" for anyone connected to the crime.

Given the severity of the assault, that attitude might be warranted. However, it is also that zealous approach that makes a wrongful arrest almost inevitable, which is exactly what happened.

Police shoot intoxicated woman four times during DUI arrest

When police are arresting someone, one of the first things they must determine is whether the alleged criminal is dangerous. When the police make the right determination, they can help ensure no one is harmed. However, when police in Portsmouth are wrong, someone almost always gets hurt.

Recently, the person who got hurt was a woman who was getting arrested on suspicion of drunk driving. The police received a tip that a car was driving erratically, and when they arrived at the scene, the car was parked on the sidewalk with the door open and the lights on. The driver was lying down inside. Although police suspected she was intoxicated and she hadn't done anything to threaten the officers or anyone else, police shot her four times with rubber bullets.

One of the bullets left a six-inch gash in the woman's leg and required 30 stitches to close the injury.

Is solitary confinement an appropriate response to juvenile crimes?

A lawsuit filed on behalf of two inmates at a juvenile detention center has prompted West Virginia to end the use of solitary confinement on offenders convicted of juvenile crimes.

The decision to end the practice was made by the director of the Division of Juvenile Services, noting that some of the state's attorneys believe that the practice of solitary confinement has been used for years despite laws prohibiting the tactic.

Do faulty DNA tests keep people wrongfully imprisoned? Part 2.

In our last post, we mentioned that DNA samples are often one of the most important pieces of evidence in a criminal defense case. Unfortunately, after an FBI expert reports that an individual's DNA matches DNA found at the crime scene, few people question the results.

However, an investigation from the Justice Department proved that DNA errors may be leaving wrongfully convicted individuals in Virginia's prisons. Moreover, an investigation from one newspaper reported that "hundreds of defendants nationwide remain in prison or on parole for crimes that might merit exoneration, a retrial or a retesting of evidence" because the DNA tests that were completed originally may have been flawed.

If the Justice Department and prosecutors are willing to sit by idly, who is responsible for ensuring people are not incarcerated for crimes they did not commit?

Do bad DNA tests keep people in Virginia wrongfully imprisoned?

In most criminal cases, DNA evidence is needed to connect an alleged criminal with a crime scene. If law enforcement officials report that DNA from the crime scene matches the DNA of the alleged criminal, that is often the final straw in convincing the jury of the person's guilt.

Unfortunately, few people ever question the validity of the DNA samples. After all, if it was tested in an FBI lab, it must be correct, right? Wrong.

Individuals in Virginia and throughout the country have been wrongfully convicted and imprisoned after faulty DNA tests "proved" they were guilty of criminal charges.

Mom pleads guilty to drug charges, receives fraction of max sentence

When people hire a criminal defense attorney, they are typically interested in achieving the best outcome in their situation. For some people, it is critical to have every charge dropped and to help ensure their criminal records stay clean.

However, there are some people in Portsmouth who know that the best outcome in their situation may still involve a mark against their criminal records. In those situations, criminal defense attorneys work hard to help minimize the charges individuals are facing as well as the penalties that may be associated with them.

Recently, one attorney helped a mother receive a fraction of the maximum sentence after pleading guilty to drug charges.

Who keeps the media in check? Book about Paterno filled with errors.

Our last post talked about the negative impact the media has had in the case regarding Trayvon Martin's shooting. Now, another news story that has garnered media attention in Portsmouth and across the country is also getting distorted by the media.

Two reporters -- Bob Dvorchak and Bill Moushey -- spent 10 weeks writing a book about Joe Paterno, Jerry Sandusky and the Penn State sex abuse scandal. In a matter of months, the story went from national headlines to a published book that is available for purchase. But something is clearly missing here. The criminal charges against Sandusky won't be heard again in trial for another few months, and no conviction has been handed down.

Surely the authors don't know what Sandusky's lawyers will bring up in trial. So how accurate can this book be?

Media jumps the gun in Trayvon Martin case

On February 26, Virginia residents, along with the rest of the country, watched as news media coverage and social media networks blew up in a frenzy over the shooting of teenager Trayvon Martin.

Vigils and "hoodie" marches were staged across the nation in support of the young victim, but perhaps without any real knowledge of any pertinent facts of the incident.

Neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman has now been charged with second-degree murder.

CONTACT US

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Visit Our Criminal Law Website Subscribe to This Blog's Feed